Site Meter Celebrity Fashion Watch » Blog Archive » Carrie Underwood look: A Hit or a Miss?

Carrie Underwood look: A Hit or a Miss?

by

Carrie Underwood

Here we go again with another look I can hardly decide if it’s a hit or a miss. Of course I have my reasons but I guess I’ll have to ask your help to give me the final verdict.

The celebrity: Carrie Underwood

The look: Short-shorts paired with an orange ruffled Bebe halter top and strappy heels

The event: 2008 CMA Music Festival in Tennessee

Hit Reason:

Of course we love seeing stars showing off their beautiful legs, and the American Idol winner is no exemption to that. She definitely has got a beautiful pair of legs.

Her hair and make-up is another hit factor; simple but fab!

Miss Reason:

Well I don’t think I like that halter top on her as she looks like she’s getting choked. Add to that the orange shade just made her look more yellowish. Then there’s her shoes. Well it’s not really hooker-like, it’s not even ugly. Yet one wouldn’t also find it glamorous and fab.

So, what should this Carrie Underwood look be? A hit or a miss?

, ,


2 Responses to “Carrie Underwood look: A Hit or a Miss?”

  1. Carrie Underwood Celebrity Gossip | Carrie Underwood takes orange to a new level Says:

    [...] coming in a short while… Source: Carrie Underwood takes orange to a new level [...]

  2. Carrie Underwood look: A Hit or a Miss? » GlamDeals.com Says:

    [...] (more…) [...]

Leave a Reply


About Celebrity Fashion Watch

Taking you to a higher level of celebrity fashion coverage. Celebrity Fashion Watch not just delivers the latest trends and the latest hits and misses in celebrity fashion but features everything and anything fashion-related.

Celebrity Fashion Watch Author(s)

Blogging Flair

Better Than Sample Sales

www.globaltopblogs.com

Shopping & Beauty Channel Posts

Hot Off The Press


Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct () in Unknown on line 0